Evaluation of indirect indices in the insulin resistance assessment in patients with different body mass index

Authors

  • Lejla Čano Dedić Department of Medical-Biochemical Diagnostics, Polyclinic Atrijum, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina; Department of Laboratory Technologies, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Arzija Pašalić Department of Nutrition and Health Dietetics, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Emsel Papić Department of Laboratory Technologies, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Emir Begagić Department of General Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Sabina Šečić Selimović Department of Nutrition and Health Dietetics, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Mario Gazibarić Department of Laboratory Technologies, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Sabina Šegalo Department of Laboratory Technologies, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9280-3278

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17532/jhsci.2024.2673

Keywords:

Insulin resistance, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance, triglyceride to glucose index, triglyceride to glucose index-body mass index

Abstract

Introduction: Insulin resistance (IR) is a complex pathophysiological condition with multifactorial etiology characterized by a reduced responsiveness of target tissues to insulin (INS). Indirect indices based on mathematical models and derived from laboratory parameters have become increasingly popular in the past two decades. In this study, we evaluated their ability to predict IR in a population with different body mass index (BMI).

Methods: The matched case–control study was conducted in 2021 and 2022. Secondary data from 129 subjects were obtained from medical records, including demographic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, and biochemical laboratory test results. The studied group consisted of 91 subjects with a suspected diagnosis of IR who were further categorized according to BMI, while control group consisted from 38 age- and gender-matched subjects. Six widely used indirect indices were calculated: Homeostatic Model Assessment for IR (HOMA-IR), quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), McAuley index (MCAi), metabolic score for IR (METS-IR), triglyceride to glucose index (TyG), and TyG to BMI (TyG-BMI).

Results: Significant differences between the subgroups were found in the mean values for HOMA-IR, TyG, TyG-BMI, and METS- IR, while the control group had the highest mean values for the indirect indices QUICKI and MCAi (p < 0.001). HOMA-IR, TyG, and TyG-BMI showed statistical significance in predicting IR regardless of BMI (p < 0.05). In the obese group, TyG-BMI had good predictive power for discriminating IR (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.820), with a sensitivity and specificity of 84.1% and 87.7%, respectively. HOMA-IR showed moderate predictive power to discriminate IR in the obese group (AUC = 0.720), with a sensitivity and specificity of 70.4% and 89.1%, respectively.

Conclusion: As IR is a multifactorial disease, indirect indices combining laboratory and anthropometric data can significantly help in predicting and mitigating complications.


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

30.09.2024

Issue

Section

Research articles

Categories

How to Cite

1.
Evaluation of indirect indices in the insulin resistance assessment in patients with different body mass index. JHSCI [Internet]. 2024 Sep. 30 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];14(2):108-14. Available from: https://jhsci.ba/ojs/index.php/jhsci/article/view/2673